[x]

The Data Center is the new name for The Greater New Orleans Community Data Center! Learn more about our new name and brand >

Fischer Development Statistical Area

Last update: Mar 28, 2014

Finding the information you need within long rows of numbers is a tricky task, even under the best of conditions. The task has become harder since the Census Bureau began using a new method for providing important neighborhood data like income, poverty, and educational attainment that is averaged over five years and has large margins of error.

For this reason, we’ve added a variety of notes to these data tables, as well as links to the definition for each indicator. Our aim is to explain details of the data that are sometimes misleading, and also to point you to additional information that you may find useful for program planning and grantwriting.

People & Household Characteristics

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Total numbers 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Population 2,034 849 484,674 343,829 281,421,906 308,745,538
Total households 506 269 188,251 142,158 105,480,101 116,716,292
Family households 425 171 112,977 76,643 71,787,347 77,538,296

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

What’s the difference between households and families? The Census definition of family is people living together who are ”related… by birth, marriage, or adoption.” In contrast, the definition of household is ”all the persons who occupy a housing unit.”

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Gender 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Female 59.5% 58.3% 53.1% 51.6% 50.9% 50.8%
Male 40.5% 41.7% 46.9% 48.4% 49.1% 49.2%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Age 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
5 years old and under 14.0% 11.8% 8.4% 7.6% 8.2% 7.9%
6-11 years old 22.7% 11.5% 9.2% 6.8% 8.9% 8.0%
12-17 years old 18.5% 15.5% 9.1% 6.9% 8.6% 8.2%
18-34 years old 21.4% 23.1% 25.9% 29.2% 23.8% 23.2%
35-49 years old 13.0% 11.0% 21.9% 19.2% 23.2% 20.7%
50-64 years old 5.9% 16.3% 13.8% 19.4% 14.9% 19.0%
65-74 years old 2.9% 5.7% 6.0% 6.1% 6.5% 7.0%
75-84 years old 1.5% 3.8% 4.2% 3.4% 4.4% 4.2%
85 years old and older .1% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.8%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Racial & ethnic diversity 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Black or African American 99.2% 97.4% 66.6% 59.6% 12.1% 12.2%
White .5% .4% 26.6% 30.5% 69.2% 63.7%
Asian 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 2.9% 3.6% 4.7%
American Indian 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% 0.7%
Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4%
2 race categories 0.2% 0.7% 1.0% 1.3% 1.6% 1.9%
Hispanic (any race) 0.1% 1.5% 3.1% 5.2% 12.5% 16.3%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

Which number do you need? There are many ways to look at household characteristics. To get a more complete perspective, we recommend you take a look at households by type, and also scroll down to view data on the types of households that children and the elderly live in. Note, we have chosen to look at “households” rather than “families” because of the Census’ narrow definition of “family.”

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Households by type 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Total households 506 269 188,251 142,158 105,480,101 116,716,292
Female householder (no husband present) with children under 18 63.3% 37.5% 17.7% 13.7% 8.4% 8.5%
Male householder (no wife present) with children under 18 0.8% 1.1% 2.5% 2.7% 2.4% 2.8%
Married-couple family, with children under 18 6.7% 5.2% 14.8% 11.1% 24.9% 21.7%
Nonfamily households, with children under 18 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.3%
Households with no people under 18 years 29.2% 56.1% 64.7% 72.3% 63.9% 66.6%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Children in households 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Population under 18 years in households 1,120 330 128,785 72,917 71,970,901 73,920,881
Children living as head of household 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
Children living with mother only 67.0% 56.4% 39.2% 39.6% 18.5% 20.0%
Children living with father only 0.5% 0.9% 4.7% 6.7% 4.9% 6.2%
Children living with married parents 6.9% 10.6% 35.9% 34.3% 66.2% 61.5%
Children living with grandparents 22.9% 29.7% 14.9% 14.2% 6.3% 7.9%
Children living with other relatives 2.1% 2.4% 3.7% 4.0% 2.1% 2.6%
Children living with non-relatives 0.6% 0.0% 1.5% 1.2% 1.9% 1.8%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Elderly in households 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Elderly in households 94 92 53,375 36,152 32,998,132 38,810,278
Living alone 34.0% 58.7% 34.2% 32.9% 29.5% 28.3%
Living in family households 66.0% 39.1% 62.6% 62.9% 68.0% 68.3%
Living in nonfamily households 0.0% 2.2% 3.2% 4.2% 2.5% 3.4%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

Housing & Housing Costs

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Occupancy status 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Total housing units (full count) 704 328 215,091 189,896 115,904,641 131,704,730
Occupied housing units 71.9% 82.0% 87.5% 74.9% 91.0% 88.6%
Vacant housing units 28.1% 18.0% 12.5% 25.1% 9.0% 11.4%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Renters and owners 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Total occupied housing units 506 269 188,251 142,158 105,480,101 116,716,292
Owner occupied 12.1% 15.6% 46.5% 47.8% 66.2% 65.1%
Renter occupied 87.9% 84.4% 53.5% 52.2% 33.8% 34.9%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF1) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Mortgage status 2000 2010 2000 2010 2000 2010
Owned with a mortgage or a loan 26.8% 40.5% 67.0% 60.8% 67.4% 69.7%
Owned free and clear 73.2% 59.5% 33.0% 39.2% 32.6% 30.3%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and U.S. Census 2010 Summary File 1 (SF1)

What’s the difference between contract rent and gross rent? Contract rent is the monthly rent agreed to (for example, the “rent” amount one finds advertised in the Classifieds), while gross rent is the contract rent plus the estimated monthly costs of utilities (electricity, gas, water, sewer and fuels) whether they are paid for by the owner or the renter. Using gross rent helps to understand the total housing costs and eliminates the effect of the different payment arrangements such as water or electricity included in rent.

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Average rental cost (in 2010 dollars) 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Average contract rent na $333 +/- $237 na $804 +/- $20 na $845 +/- $4
Average gross rent na $490 +/- $334 na $986 +/- $24 na $995 +/- $5

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

na: This question was asked differently in 2000 and therefore is not comparable to 2008-2012.

How much house can a person afford? Census data can be used to determine how many households might be struggling to meet the costs associated with housing. There is no “magic number” to determine whether housing is affordable or not. According to conventional mortgage underwriting guidelines, the maximum amount of gross income that can be used for mortgage payments alone is 28%; the total for all debt payments including projected mortgage payments is 36%. The 28% threshold does not include other housing costs such as homeowner’s insurance, taxes and utilities, and the 36% number includes non-housing costs such as credit card debt and car payments.

With this in mind, we aimed for a threshold in between those two. The closest number published by the Census is whether households are paying 30% or more of income on housing. And this is the number used by the federal government for many of their housing programs.

Housing affordability by owner/renter status Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Owner occupied paying 30% or more of income on housing na 22.0% +/- 69.2% na 34.6% +/- 1.3% na 29.8% +/- 0.1%
Renter occupied paying 30% or more of income on housing na 29.7% +/- 26.4% na 62.9% +/- 1.6% na 52.1% +/- 0.1%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

na: This question was asked differently in 2000 and therefore is not comparable to 2008-2012.

Income & Poverty

People can have more than one source of income. The indicators we’ve compiled look at the percent of households that reported each type of income. We hope that this approach will paint a useful picture of how households in the neighborhood get their income.

What these numbers cannot tell you is whether each of these categories of reported income is the primary source or whether, for example, self-employment is a second job. Therefore, these data points cannot be combined.

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Household income type 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Wage or salary income 57.8% 57.7% +/- 25% 73.3% 72.6% +/- 0.7% 77.7% 75.7% +/- 0.1%
Self-employment income 3.7% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 8.7% 9.9% +/- 0.5% 11.9% 11.0% +/- 0%
Interest, dividends, or net rental income 3.1% 4.5% +/- 6.5% 23.7% 16.9% +/- 0.6% 35.9% 22.4% +/- 0.2%
Social Security income 14.6% 38.5% +/- 10.3% 24.7% 24.2% +/- 0.5% 25.7% 28.3% +/- 0.1%
Supplemental security income 10.6% 16.8% +/- 11% 7.8% 7.4% +/- 0.4% 4.4% 4.6% +/- 0%
Public assistance income 18.5% 5.6% +/- 7.5% 5.4% 2.1% +/- 0.3% 3.4% 2.7% +/- 0%
Retirement income 8.3% 17.1% +/- 10.9% 13.4% 13.1% +/- 0.4% 16.7% 17.6% +/- 0.1%
Other types of income 16.0% 17.1% +/- 11.8% 12.4% 9.9% +/- 0.5% 13.2% 14.4% +/- 0%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

The preferred measure for income is median, rather than average, because medians are not affected by extreme values. Because the Census doesn’t release the individual data points necessary to calculate medians, we do not present medians for specific neighborhoods. But, you can go the the Census web site to get median incomes for specific census tracts and some cities and towns.

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Average household income 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Average household income (in 2012 dollars) $17,790 $23,700 +/- $13,063 $59,497 $60,280 +/- $1,294 $78,056 $73,034 +/- $308

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Income Distribution 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Less than $10,000 70.3% 28.0% +/- 11.2% 21.0% 15.4% +/- 0.8% 9.5% 7.2% +/- 0.2%
$10,000-14,999 7.5% 14.0% +/- 11.8% 9.6% 7.8% +/- 0.6% 6.3% 5.4% +/- 0%
$15,000-19,999 7.7% 9.8% +/- 10% 8.3% 7.6% +/- 0.5% 6.3% 5.3% +/- 0%
$20,000-24,999 2.7% 11.5% +/- 10.9% 7.5% 6.3% +/- 0.5% 6.6% 5.4% +/- 0%
$25,000-29,999 6.7% 15.7% +/- 22.2% 7.2% 6.0% +/- 0.4% 6.4% 5.2% +/- 0%
$30,000-34,999 0.0% 2.1% +/- 3.8% 6.3% 5.3% +/- 0.4% 6.4% 5.2% +/- 0%
$35,000-39,999 1.2% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 5.4% 4.2% +/- 0.3% 5.9% 4.7% +/- 0%
$40,000-44,999 1.5% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 4.6% 4.7% +/- 0.4% 5.7% 4.8% +/- 0%
$45,000-49,999 1.2% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 4.0% 3.9% +/- 0.4% 5.0% 4.2% +/- 0%
$50,000-59,999 0.0% 11.5% +/- 13.8% 6.1% 6.8% +/- 0.4% 9.0% 8.1% +/- 0%
$60,000-74,999 0.0% 7.3% +/- 6.6% 6.5% 7.7% +/- 0.5% 10.4% 10.1% +/- 0%
$75,000-99,999 0.0% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 5.7% 8.6% +/- 0.4% 10.2% 12.2% +/- 0%
$100,000-124,999 0.0% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 2.8% 5.2% +/- 0.5% 5.2% 8.0% +/- 0%
$125,000-149,999 0.0% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 1.4% 3.2% +/- 0.4% 2.5% 4.8% +/- 0%
$150,000-199,999 0.0% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 1.4% 3.1% +/- 0.3% 2.2% 4.8% +/- 0%
$200,000 or more 1.2% 0.0% +/- 4.2% 2.2% 4.1% +/- 0.2% 2.4% 4.6% +/- 0%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

Most experts agree that the Census’ definition of poverty is flawed. The Census still uses the federal definition for poverty that was first created in 1964. Although it has been adjusted for inflation, it had some flaws back then, and it has even more flaws now.

The original calculations were based on studies from the early 1960s that indicated that family food costs were about one-third of a family’s budget. At that time, no similar studies on a family’s housing costs existed. So, the federal government simply estimated the cost of a nutritionally adequate diet in 1964 and multiplied that by three to come up with a minimum family budget. But housing costs have risen much faster than food costs since 1964.

Today food costs are estimated to be only 20-25% of a family’s budget, so multiplying food costs by three would not be enough to pay for basic needs today – yet that is the assumption behind the current poverty estimates. The current calculations don’t count non-cash government aid, such as Medicaid or food stamps, as income, and don’t account for medical out of pocket costs, a particularly large expense for seniors. And they aren’t adjusted for differences in costs of living in different parts of the country. Given these flaws, some researchers around the country have tried to develop alternative measures that would really get at who has an adequate income and who doesn’t.

In the meantime, the poverty data below is probably still the best place to start when describing need in your community.

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Population in poverty 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
People living in poverty 88.2% 58.0% +/- 28.2% 27.9% 27.2% +/- 0.7% 12.4% 14.9% +/- 0.1%
People living at or above poverty 11.8% 42.0% +/- 11.1% 72.1% 72.8% +/- 0.7% 87.6% 85.1% +/- 0.1%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

 

Transportation

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Vehicles available 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
No vehicle available 72.5% 53.1% +/- 20.2% 27.3% 18.5% +/- 0.6% 10.3% 9.0% +/- 0%
1 vehicle available 23.8% 29.7% +/- 15.4% 42.3% 45.4% +/- 0.8% 34.2% 33.7% +/- 0%
2 or more vehicles available 3.7% 17.1% +/- 18.6% 30.4% 36.2% +/- 0.8% 55.5% 57.3% +/- 0.1%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2010 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Type of transportation, workers 16+ 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Car, truck, or van 38.1% 87.9% +/- 18.6% 76.4% 80.9% +/- 0.7% 87.9% 86.2% +/- 0.1%
Public transportation 42.2% 7.1% +/- 7.1% 13.2% 6.9% +/- 0.5% 4.6% 5.0% +/- 0%
Bicycle 3.0% 0.0% +/- 6.6% 1.2% 2.1% +/- 0.2% 0.4% 0.6% +/- 0%
Walked 13.1% 0.0% +/- 6.6% 5.2% 5.1% +/- 0.4% 2.9% 2.8% +/- 0%
Other means 1.5% 0.0% +/- 6.6% 1.3% 1.1% +/- 0.2% 1.0% 0.9% +/- 0%
Worked from home 2.2% 4.9% +/- 10% 2.7% 3.2% +/- 0.3% 3.3% 4.3% +/- 0%

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Travel time to work, workers 16+ 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Average travel time to work (minutes) 31 26 23 +/- 1 25 25 +/- 0
Less than 30 minutes 50.8% 67.6% +/- 23.4% 66.4% 71.5% +/- 1.2% 63.4% 64.4% +/- 0.1%
30 to 44 minutes 31.3% 32.4% +/- 19.6% 20.3% 18.4% +/- 0.7% 18.5% 20.0% +/- 0%
45 to 59 minutes 1.9% 0.0% +/- 6.9% 6.1% 4.6% +/- 0.5% 7.2% 7.5% +/- 0%
More than 60 minutes 16.0% 0.0% +/- 9.8% 7.2% 5.4% +/- 0.4% 7.7% 8.1% +/- 0%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

Educational Attainment

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
Level of schooling, 18+ 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Less than 9th grade 11.4% 9.5% +/- 8.2% 7.2% 4.5% +/- 0.3% 7.1% 5.5% +/- 0%
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 51.4% 30.0% +/- 8.1% 18.2% 11.1% +/- 0.4% 13.2% 9.0% +/- 0%
High school diploma or GED 29.1% 43.2% +/- 17.5% 24.0% 25.5% +/- 0.6% 28.6% 28.4% +/- 0%
Some college, no degree 4.3% 6.5% +/- 8.8% 24.2% 25.0% +/- 0.6% 22.8% 23.8% +/- 0%
Associate’s degree 0.3% 0.0% +/- 7.5% 3.3% 3.8% +/- 0.2% 6.0% 7.3% +/- 0%
Bachelor’s degree 1.9% 8.3% +/- 9.4% 13.9% 17.9% +/- 0.5% 14.5% 16.7% +/- 0%
Graduate or professional degree 1.4% 2.6% +/- 8.3% 9.2% 12.1% +/- 0.3% 7.8% 9.3% +/- 0%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

Language

English as a second language and ability to speak English. The Census asks whether a language other than English is spoken at home. People who do speak a language other than English at home are then asked to report how well they speak English.

We’ve combined the categories of people who speak only English at home with those who speak another language at home but report that they speak English “well.” This way we can focus on data about those individuals for whom speaking English is a barrier.

Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
English as a second language 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE* 2000 2008-2012 MOE*
Native English speaker or speaks English as a second language “well” or “very well” 100.0% 100.0% +/- 7.6% 98.7% 98.0% +/- 0.5% 95.8% 95.3% +/- 0%
Speaks Spanish at home and speaks English “not well” or “not at all” 0.0% 0.0% +/- 3.7% 0.6% 1.2% +/- 0.2% 3.0% 3.4% +/- 0%
Speaks other languages at home and speaks English “not well” or “not at all” 0.0% 0.0% +/- 6.4% 0.7% 0.8% +/- 0.1% 1.2% 1.3% +/- 0%

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of data from U.S. Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) and 2008-2012 American Community Survey

* Margins of error (MOE) for the 2008-2012 ACS data are based on a 90% confidence level.

Employment

Workers living in the neighborhood. The Census Bureau collects data on the monthly earnings of workers living in a neighborhood, along with the industry sector they work in.

Workers living in the neighborhood by wage level Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
2004 2011 2004 2011 2004 2011
Total number of workers living in the neighborhood 250 158 172,274 112,739 na na
$1,250 per month or less 56.0% 31.0% 33.8% 24.0% na na
$1,251 – $3,333 per month 38.0% 53.8% 44.0% 41.6% na na
More than $3,333 per month 6.0% 15.2% 22.2% 34.4% na na

Source Citation: The Data Center analysis of Local Employment Dynamics, U.S. Census Bureau

na: This data is unavailable for the United States

Workers living in the neighborhood by industry sector Fischer Development Orleans Parish United States
2004 2011 2004 2011 2004 2011
Total number of workers living in the neighborhood 250 158 172,274 112,739 na na
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% na na
Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 0.8% 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% na na
Utilities 0.8% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% na na
Construction 3.2% 10.1% 3.1% 4.3% na na
Manufacturing 4.4% 6.3% 4.1% 3.8% na na
Wholesale Trade 1.2% 1.9% 3.0% 2.7% na na
Retail Trade 12.0% 10.1% 10.3% 11.1% na na
Transportation and Warehousing 2.4% 5.7% 3.9% 4.0% na na
Information 0.4% 1.3% 1.8% 2.0% na na
Finance and Insurance 3.2% 2.5% 4.6% 3.6% na na
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 2.0% 1.9% 2.0% 1.7% na na
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 3.2% 2.5% 5.6% 5.6% na na
Management of Companies and Enterprises 1.2% 1.3% 1.6% 1.8% na na
Administration & Support, Waste Management and Remediation 12.0% 8.2% 7.0% 6.9% na na
Educational Services 7.2% 5.7% 11.8% 10.4% na na
Health Care and Social Assistance 11.6% 13.9% 13.7% 14.5% na na
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 4.8% 2.5% 3.5% 2.3% na na
Accommodation and Food Services 22.4% 18.4% 14.5% 17.1% na na
Other Services (excluding Public Administration) 3.6% 0.6% 3.5% 2.8% na na
Public Administration 3.6% 6.3% 4.4% 4.0% na na

Source Citation: GNOCDC analysis of Local Employment Dynamics, U.S. Census Bureau

na: This data is unavailable for the United States

Email Share